Preprint has been submitted for publication in journal
Preprint / Version 1

Model-Informed Joint Material-Structural Optimization of Hard-Magnetic Soft Materials

##article.authors##

  • Ian Galloway South Dakota School of Mines and Technology
  • Prashant Jha South Dakota School of Mines and Technology 0000-0003-2158-364X

Keywords:

Hard-magnetic soft materials, topology optimization, constitutive model selection, structure-property relations, magneto-mechanical coupling, joint material-structural design

Abstract

This work develops a model-informed framework for predictive analysis and optimal design of hard-magnetic soft materials (hMSMs). These materials undergo contact-free, field-driven deformation, making them attractive for soft robotics, adaptive structures, and bio-inspired systems. Accurate prediction requires effective structure--property relations, while optimal design requires simultaneous control of structural density, magnetic particle distribution, and remanent magnetization direction. To address these issues, this work makes two main contributions. First, classical rigid-inclusion relations, a Hill self-consistent relation, and constrained-kinematics models are placed into a unified effective shear-modulus framework for particle-filled elastomers. With one default control relation, seven shear-modulus relations are combined with three strain-energy density functions to obtain 21 constitutive models. The results show that the strain-energy density form has a relatively small effect for the actuation problems considered, whereas the effective shear-modulus relation can significantly affect deformation when magnetic material overlaps with highly deforming regions. Experimental stress--strain data are then used to select a representative shear-modulus relation, with the Mooney relation giving the best overall agreement. Second, using the selected constitutive model, a joint material--structural optimization framework is developed for simultaneous design of structural density, magnetic particle volume fraction, and remanent magnetization direction. Rotational, translational, and restorative examples show that the framework handles different active design fields, objectives, and single- or multi-load-case formulations, producing non-intuitive hMSM designs with prescribed deformation responses. The framework is implemented in the open-source \texttt{CEADpx/top\_optim} repository.

Author Biography

Ian Galloway, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Graduate student, Mechanical Engineering.

Posted

2026-07-17